Publication Assignment Instructions
1. Review the publication as if it were a draft manuscript and you volunteered to review the manuscript “written critique” for the editor as part of the peer-review process. This is to give you experience prior to being asked to conduct a review for the first time. Reviewing publications is a valuable service to the profession. Faculty in PDD collectively are reviewers for dozens of journals.
2. DON’T REIVIEW THE LANGUAGE AND GRAMMER ISSUES JUST FOUCOS ON THE FEEDBACK FOR THE SUBJECT AND PROCESS
3. Review your assigned manuscript following these instructions:
Review the following for more information on your responsibilities as a scientific reviewer:
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE): https://publicationethics.org/files/Ethical_Guidelines_For_Peer_Reviewers_2.pdf
4. Conclude your review with your thoughts on additional studies that could be conducted to advance the science to the next step. (1-2 sentences)