Utilization of Non-Licensed Personnel (Medication Aides, Lifting Teams, Transport Teams)
Disclaimer.The materials on this page are intended for informational and educational purposes. No individuals should use the information, resources or tools contained herein to self-diagnosis or self-treat any health-related condition. The content of the website is not meant to be a substitute for advice provided by a doctor or other qualified health care professional. The company will not be held responsible for any negative consequences arising from the use of information posted on this site.
The most common patient handling approaches in the United States include manual patient lifting, classes in body mechanics, training in safe lifting techniques, and back belts. Surprisingly there is strong evidence that each of these commonly used approaches is not effective in reducing caregiver injuries. A major paradigm shift is needed away from these ineffective approaches towards the following evidennuce-based practices.
Only few qualitative studies were found on this topic, of which, only one was qualitative in nature. Studies have found that nurses report a lack of knowledge on how to properly delegate activities to UAPs and an insufficient knowledge regarding the UAPs training. Although still responsible for the comprehensive patient care, many nurses expressed frustration with multiple additional responsibilities unrelated to direct bedside care, even if they were assisted during the work by an UAP.
Is it a relationship of complementarity, in which staffing of both groups rises and falls together in response to factors such as patient volume? Is it a relationship of substitution, in which the hiring of more CNLP allows hospitals to hire fewer nurses? Or is it some combination of the two, depending on management strategies and a hospital and region's context? These questions are relevant to hospitals’ efforts to maximize labor efficiency, minimize nurse burnout and turnover, and, of course, protect and improve patient outcomes. They are also pertinent to the question of state laws regarding minimum nurse‐to‐patient ratios. With two states mandating ratios (California and Massachusetts1) and 14 other states requiring either staffing committees or public reporting of nurse staffing levels, the policy focus has been primarily on RNs, with little or no consideration of how CNLP staffing affects nurses’ workloads (Emergency Nurses Association 2014; ANA 2015).On the other hand, Potter et al. (2003) found a negative association between RN and patient care technicians, suggesting a possible substitution effect. More recent studies on the effects of California's nurse staffing law also found decreased use of nurse aides and orderlies associated with increased use of nurses in hospitals attempting to meet the minimum patient‐to‐nurse ratios.
Non-nursing functions not involving direct patient care require professional nursing knowledge and oversight, but do not need case by case assessment and decision making by the registered nurse. It is the nurse's obligation to judiciously determine tasks that can reasonably be assigned to unlicensed persons.
McHugh, M. D. , Kelly L. A., Sloane D. M., and Aiken L. H.. 2011. “Contradicting Fears, California's Nurse‐to‐Patient Mandate Did Not Reduce the Skill Level of the Nursing Workforce in Hospitals.” Health Affairs 30 (7): 1299–306.
Donaldson, N. , Bolton L. B., Aydin C., Brown D., Elashoff J. D., and Sandhu M.. 2005. “Impact of California's Licensed Nurse‐Patient Ratios on Unit‐Level Nurse Staffing and Patient Outcomes.” Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice 6 (3): 198–210.
Emergency Nurses Association . 2014. “50 State Nurse Safe Staffing Laws”
Potter, P. , Barr N., McSweeney M., and Sledge J.. 2003. “Identifying Nurse Staffing and Patient Outcome Relationships: A Guide for Change in Care Delivery.” Nursing Economics 21 (4): 158.