Asian Americans as an Example of a Second-Generation Immigrant-Descent Minority
Census Bureau data. They have higher incomes; more are college graduates and homeowners; and fewer live in poverty. In all of these measures, their characteristics resemble those of the full U.S. adult population. Hispanics and Asian Americans make up about seven-in-ten of today’s adult immigrants and about half of today’s adult second generation. Pew Research surveys find that the second generations of both groups are much more likely than the immigrants to speak English; to have friends and spouses outside their ethnic or racial group, to say their group gets along well with others, and to think of themselves as a “typical American.” The Pew Research surveys also find that second-generation Hispanics and Asian Americans place more importance than does the general public on hard work and career success. They are more inclined to call themselves liberal and less likely to identify as Republicans. And for the most part they are more likely to say their standard of living is higher than that of their parents at the same stage of life. In all of these measures, the second generation resembles the immigrant generation more closely than the general public.
Hmong (28.3%), Bhutanese (33.3%) and Burmese (35.0%) had the highest poverty rates among Asian groups, while the lowest rates were among Filipinos (7.5%), Indians (7.5%) and Japanese (8.4%).
Neidert Lisa J, Farley Reynolds. Assimilation in the United States: An Analysis of Ethnic and Generation Differences in Status and Achievement. American Sociological Review. 1985 Dec;50(6):840–50.
Borjas George J. Long-Run Convergence of Ethnic Skill Differentials: The Children and Grandchildren of the Great Migration. Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 1994 Jul;47(4):553–73.
Perlmann Joel. Italians Then, Mexicans Now: Immigrant Origins and Second-Generation Progress, 1890–2000. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2005.
Farley Reynolds, Alba Richard. The New Second Generation in the United States. International Migration Review. 2002 Fall;36(3):669–701.