Why Focusing Only on Vocabulary and Jargon in LSP Courses Is Ineffective in Developing Overall Communicative Competence in Workplaces.
The relatively minor importance attached to lexical knowledge and context was visible in the scant attention paid to it by second language researchers and teachers in the last decade.
There is a plethora of research that has been carried out internationally in Needs Analysis. All these studies confirmed the importance of identifying learners’ needs and showed the risk and dangers of ignoring needs analysis in designing ESP courses. Two key historical periods breathed life into ESP. First, the end of the Second World War brought with it an “age of enormous and unprecedented expansion in scientific, technical activity on an international scale for various reasons, most notably the economic power of the United States in the post-war world, the role (of international language) fell to English.” Second, the oil crisis of the early 1970s resulted in Western money and knowledge flowing into the oil-rich countries. The language of this knowledge became English. As a result, English came out of English classrooms to fulfill the wishes, needs and demands of the elite around the world.
This chapter has shown why it is important to learn new words and why English vocabulary is difficult to memorize. Moreover, it dealt with two main reasons for which most of the students permanently forget the words acquired.
Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2000). Changing the role of schools. In B. Cope and M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 121-148). London and New York: Routledge.
Kasper, L. (2000). Content-based college ESL instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Laroche, L. (2003). Managing cultural diversity in technical professions. New York: Butterworth Heinemann.
Lippi-Green, R. (1997). English with an accent: Language, ideology and discrimination in the United States. London and New York: Routledge.
Mason, J. (2000). Ethnography in cyberspace: Data collection via email and instant messaging. Inkshed 18(1), 7-9.