Are There Planning Considerations the DIV Could Assume From Other JLTV Fieldings?
Some exceptions have been granted where no suitable alternatives are identified to include: cadmium on military electrical connectors, CARC primers and topcoats, lead solder, leadacid batteries, and small percentages of lead in alloys. A formal process is in place if the vendor identifies any other uses of prohibited materials for which they do not have a suitable alternative. Compared with other Army ground system programs, the JLTV has made great strides in the elimination of both cadmium and hexavalent chromium. Based on the efforts over the past 2 years it is anticipated that only a handful of parts containing these materials will remain on the production vehicles. Each will be tracked by part number and identified in the JLTV Demilitarization and Disposal Plan when it is prepared. The remaining hazardous materials identified in the HMMRs include typical materials associated with ground vehicles to include petroleum, oil, lubricants, coolants, paints, primer, adhesives, sealants, and batteries all of which can be easily managed.
Taken collectively, these issues might merit DOD and policymakers examining the future of JLTV procurement to help determine the current requirement for JLTVs as well as if decisions to extend procurement and re-compete future production will result in increased programmatic costs (CRS Report R41293).
DOD is also committed to preparing a comprehensive and unified strategy and implementation plan for making sound investment decisions for TWVs.
CRS Report R41293, The Nunn-McCurdy Act: Background, Analysis, and Issues for Congress, by Moshe Schwartz and Charles V. O'Connor.
Matthew Cox, “Army to Cut JLTV Buy to Pay for Future Systems,” Militray.com, March 13, 2019