Instructions How to Write

Automation and the Challenge With Human Factors

BSA Capstone papers should include the following sections:

• Abstract
• Introduction – Include why is this a Problem?
• Background
• Review of Relevant Literature
• Results
• Conclusions
• Recommendations
• References
• Appendices (if required)

Abstract
Automation is so reliable that pilots don’t realize that habits have become degraded. Multiple studies have shown that many pilots poorly understand aspects of auto flight modes. Inadequacies have been found in many areas of pilot training with the lack of in-depth training needed for the increasingly complex technology in automation in the flight decks, but given the fundamental understanding and on their own through on the job training gaining more knowledge with time. Airlines are providing only the FAA mandated training. No matter how sophisticated or complex the aircraft flight management system and computers are, the final computation for accuracy must be done with the pilot’s personal computer, their brains. With the human brain desiring active engagement for challenging and stimulating tasks monitoring automation can be compared to watching paint dry or grass grow. Airline pilots not only need the skill, but the confidence in realistic skills to quickly intervene when automation goes wrong.

Statement of the problem
Advancement and design of airliner flight decks are designed for the purpose of reducing workload for the pilots of the commercial airliner. Automation has allowed increase aviation safety around the world. The issue with automation may produce situations where pilots may not understand the information and lose situational awareness. Automation is a great advancement but human factors cause scenarios where the pilots don’t understand the information being provided, do not trust the information, or become too reliable on this technology.
A common saying in the flight deck is What is it doing now? What brings the pilots to say these words will be looked at throughout this research to include not understanding the automation, not trusting the information, training on automation, and becoming too reliable with it. The research will look into automation, how it has improved safety and how human factors have influenced automation both positive and negatively.

references
Bendheim, A. (2018). The effects of automation on human performance in high-risk
environments: A design research case study on cockpit automation in commercial aircrafts in israel. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12doi:10.3389/conf.fnhum.2018.227.00071
Casner, S. M. (2006). Cockpit automation: For general aviators and future airline pilots.
Newcastle, Wash: Aviation Supplies & Academics.
Casner, S. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2014). Thoughts in flight: Automation use and pilots’ task
related and task-unrelated thought. Human Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 56(3), 433-442. doi:10.1177/0018720813501550
Gil, G., Kaber, D., Kaufmann, K., & Kim, S. (2012). Effects of modes of cockpit automation on
pilot performance and workload in a next generation flight concept of operation. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 22(5), 395-406. doi:10.1002/hfm.20377
Letsu-Dake, E., Rogers, W., Dorneich, M., & De Mers, R. (2013). Innovative Flight Deck
Function Allocation Concepts for NextGen. In S. Landry, Advances in Human Aspects of Aviation (1st ed., pp. 301-310). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Retrieved from http://www.imse.iastate.edu/dorneich/files/2013/02/2012_AHFE_NextDeck.pdf
Lutat, C. J., & Swah, S. R. (2013). Automation airmanship: Nine principles for operating glass
cockpit aircraft. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Mouloua, M., Ferraro, J. C., Kaplan, A. D., Mangos, P., & A. Hancock, P. (2020). Human
factors issues regarding automation trust in UAS operation, selection, and training. (1st ed., pp. 169-190) CRC Press. doi:10.1201/9780429458330-9
Prevot, T., Homola, J., & Mercer, J. (2008, September). Human-in-the-loop evaluation of
ground-based automated separation assurance for nextgen. In Congress of International
Council of the Aeronautical Sciences Anchorage, Anchorage, AK.
Theunissen, E., Rademaker, R. M., & Lambregts, A. A. (2011, October). Navigation system
autonomy and integration in NextGen: Challenges and solutions. In Digital Avionics
Systems Conference (DASC), 2011 IEEE/AIAA 30th (pp. 6C5-1). IEEE.
Wiener, E. L., & Nagel, D. C. (Eds.). (1988). Human factors in aviation. Gulf Professional
Publishing.

Was this essay example useful for you?

Do you need extra help?

Order unique essay written for you
ORDER NOW